An argument against the unethical and unreliable method of experimentation on animals animal testing

These profoundly important—and often undetected—differences are likely one of the main reasons human clinical trials fail. Therefore, that will be giving unreliable results to be passed on for further experimentation.

Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science ; Both sides have excellent points that they attempt to bring across to prove they are right; however, the pro side has one fact that the con side cannot ignore.

Many people might feel safer having a drug tested on them if it was experimented on with technology and human tissues instead of having it tested on animals. This is not our doing, it is just the type of society we were all born into.

Using animals to test drugs is outdated and unreliable

See note 29, Perrin and Wilkins et al. Cell cultures and human tissue sampling are great new resources that have come a long way, but they are still unable to simulate the body as a whole.

Today, one can even become a board-certified surgeon without harming any animals. There is little evidence to suggest that a female rat, dog, or monkey sufficiently reproduces the physiology of a human female. Reproducing human diseases in animals requires reproducing the predisposing diseases, also a formidable challenge.

Lane E, Dunnett S. In Against Animal Testing, a pamphlet published by The Body Shop, a well-known cosmetics and bath-product company based in London, the development of products that "use natural ingredients, like bananas and Basil nut oil, as well as others with a long history of safe human usage" is advocated instead of testing on animals 3.

International Brain Injury Association; available at http: Minimum information about animal experiments: Since, you mentioned that fatality rate would be higher if we used humans for the experiments but what if the fatality rated did not fluctuate or maybe it would stay that same.

While the MRI, is a great tool. Non-human primates in medical research and drug development: Effects of conjugated equine estrogen in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: The bottom line is that animal experiments, no matter the species used or the type of disease research undertaken, are highly unreliable—and they have too little predictive value to justify the resultant risks of harms for humans, for reasons I now explain.

Yet all of about 90 HIV vaccines that succeeded in animals failed in humans. It is naive to say that the death rate would be high only because they were sick before experiments and were likely to die anyways. Experimental models of traumatic brain injury: The use of the Draize test and the LD50 test to examine product toxicity has decreased over the past few years, but these tests have not been eliminated completely.

Animal Testing

Through the use of animal testing, insulin was produced and we now have treatment for Type 1 diabetes. Like I mentioned in my first post, Animal testing is a part of the process for discovering and creating medicine.

Donated human bodies and skin leftovers from surgical procedures can be used to test how certain chemical effect our skin without actually causing pain to us.

Whether or not scientists follow regulations weighs nothing in this debate. Because much pharmaceutical company preclinical data are proprietary and thus publicly unavailable, it is difficult to know the number of missed opportunities due to misleading animal experiments.

See note 15, Akhtar et al. For one, animals are bred in the lab for the soul purpose of being apart of the animal testing process. I think this question is essential because many people today are alive thanks to the testing on animals that help to find treatments for many types of cancer.

These methods are new, and have not been perfected yet. Nonhuman animal (“animal”) experimentation is typically defended by arguments that it is reliable, that animals provide sufficiently good models of human biology and diseases to yield relevant information, and that, consequently, its use provides major human health benefits.

I demonstrate that a. Read the arguments software developer resume writing service of others Operation Crossroads was a pair of an argument against the unethical and unreliable method of experimentation on animals animal testing nuclear weapon tests conducted by the United States at Bikini Atoll in an argument against the unethical and unreliable method of.

The fact that the results attained from experiments on animal testing do not accurately portray their influence on humans is considered to be a one of the serious argument against the animal testing.

The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation

Humans are quite different from other animals, so the consequences of animal testing may. Nonhuman animal (“animal”) experimentation is typically defended by arguments that it is reliable, that animals provide sufficiently good models of human biology and diseases to yield relevant information, and that, consequently, its use provides major human health benefits.

 Animal Testing: The Destruction of Animals Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, is the use of non-human animals in experiments and development project, usually to determine toxicity, dosing and efficacy of drugs before proceeding to human clinical trials (Biology online. Animal testing is the use of animals in experimentation and development projects; usually to further scientific understanding.

animal testing Essay Examples

Animals that experience the same illnesses as human beings serve as models to study responses of the immune system. “In tests of potential carcinogens, subjects are.

An argument against the unethical and unreliable method of experimentation on animals animal testing
Rated 5/5 based on 49 review
Save the Animals: Stop Animal Testing